.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism

To dissolve, submerge, and cause to disappear the political or governmental system in the economic system by reducing, simplifying, decentralizing and suppressing, one after another, all the wheels of this great machine, which is called the Government or the State. --Proudhon, General Idea of the Revolution

My Photo
Location: Northwest Arkansas, United States

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Libertarian-Left Electoral Alliance Version 2.0

This time it's Jesse Walker's platform , a list of things for Democrats to do if they want to get libertarian votes (I actually got it via Jim Henley, because the posts at Hit&Run disappear off the front page pretty fast if you don't check every day). Anyway, his recommendations are 1) to start getting tough in the areas they pay lip service to (like undeclared wars and USA PATRIOT), and 2) to stop being such authoritarian prigs about guns and smoking.

Best of all, though, is #3:

3. Don't be a slave to the bureaucracy. Look, I don't expect you to turn into a libertarian. But there are ways to achieve progressive goals without expanding the federal government, and if you're willing to entertain enough of those ideas, you'll be more appealing than a "free-market" president who makes LBJ look thrifty. You could talk about the harm done by agriculture subsidies, by occupational licensing, by eminent domain, by the insane tangle of patent law. And no, I don't expect you to call for abolishing the welfare state -- but maybe you'd like to replace those top-heavy bureacracies with a negative income tax?

Hell, just change "negative income tax" to "citizen's dividend," and the guy could call himself a Geolibertarian. I still don't find the Georgist arguments for taxing site value to be all that convincing, at least as an end-state policy. But if you're gonna do it, it's better to just evenly distribute the revenue and then let people use the money to contract services on the free market, rather than use it to fund government-provided services.

Of course, all this immediately cuts out the corporate center of the party, and its authoritarian nanny statists--the Hillary/Lieberman/Feinstein wing; but you never know what interesting mix of ideas will come out of people like Dean, Feingold, or Jerry Brown.

At any rate, simply adopting a "libertarian lite" approach like Plank No. 3 would probably be enough to put a Democratic candidate ahead of most Republicans when it comes to free market practice. The common libertarian impression that Republicans are friendlier than Democrats to free markets, despite their massive promotion of corporate mercantilism, comes mainly from the fact that their brand identity comes from talking so much about "free markets." But that means about as much as the other side's "Democrats care" branding.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

No mention by Jesse of school choice. That's a real divisive issue.

I recall reading that the ACORN organization in Chicago was supporting inner city children (well, parents actually) having the ability to choose any public school they want, especially because it gave them access to the better suburban schools. Now that's something to latch on to.


July 09, 2006 11:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home