Let’s think first about revitalization successes; they are great and good teachers. They don’t result from gigantic plans and show-off projects, in New York or in other cities either. They build up gradually and authentically from diverse human communities; successful city revitalization builds itself on these community foundations, as the community-devised plan 197a does.
What the intelligently worked out plan devised by the community itself does not do is worth noticing. It does not destroy hundreds of manufacturing jobs, desperately needed by New York citizens and by the city’s stagnating and stunted manufacturing economy. The community’s plan does not cheat the future by neglecting to provide provisions for schools, daycare, recreational outdoor sports, and pleasant facilities for those things. The community’s plan does not promote new housing at the expense of both existing housing and imaginative and economical new shelter that residents can afford. The community’s plan does not violate the existing scale of the community, nor does it insult the visual and economic advantages of neighborhoods that are precisely of the kind that demonstrably attract artists and other live-work craftsmen, initiating spontaneous and self-organizing renewal....
[T]he proposal put before you by city staff is an ambush containing all those destructive consequences, packaged very sneakily with visually tiresome, unimaginative and imitative luxury project towers.... If you follow the proposal before you today, you will maybe enrich a few heedless and ignorant developers, but at the cost of an ugly and intractable mistake. Even the presumed beneficiaries of this misuse of governmental powers, the developers and financiers of luxury towers, may not benefit; misused environments are not good long-term economic bets.
To dissolve, submerge, and cause to disappear the political or governmental system in the economic system by reducing, simplifying, decentralizing and suppressing, one after another, all the wheels of this great machine, which is called the Government or the State. --Proudhon, General Idea of the Revolution
Friday, May 27, 2005
Jane Jacobs Letter to Bloomberg
Via Progressive Review. Jane Jacobs takes on NYC's local Cockroach Caucus:
Posting here because its the latest post. stumbled across your site and must say am very very impressed. pretty new to the blogosphere and also to the world of anarchism and this is a most engaging site which solves the issue of being utterly repulsed by most of those who march around labelling themselves libertarians in their support for the greatest example of state intervention - war. thanks.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks, pablo. Thanks also for the plugs on your blog (I checked it out, and look forward to a lot more happy digging).
ReplyDeleteApparently, Jane Jacobs is a tongue-in-cheek supervillain in an off-Broadway play. Check out the National Post.
ReplyDelete